Kostenloser Versand ab 50€ *gilt nur für DE
Skip to content

Sustainability Report 2025

As a family-run company with its own fully integrated production sites in Turkey and Egypt, Weberei Pahl is deeply embedded in textile supply chains. Sustainability is an integral part of our corporate strategy and of our responsibility towards people and the environment.

1. Introduction and Fundamental Stance

We are guided by internationally recognised standards:

  • UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
  • OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises
  • ILO Core Labour Standards
  • National action plans and sectoral guidelines (e.g. Textilbündnis)

Our policy statement forms the foundation of our actions. It is publicly accessible and has been supplemented by guidelines on human rights, child labour, discrimination, health and environmental protection. The values and principles set out in the policy statement are underpinned by concrete measures for managing human-rights-related and environment-related risks. An overview of prioritised risks and established due diligence processes can be found in the following chapters of this report.

2. Risks & Due Diligence Processes

Our risk analysis is based on a structured assessment along the supply chain (Tier 1 and Tier 2) and evaluates the probability of occurrence as well as the severity of the impacts. Prioritised risks concern:

  • Occupational health and safety
  • Discrimination against vulnerable groups
  • Environmental impacts in the wet processes
  • Access to living wages

Our measures include, among others:

  • Regular external audits (e.g. Sedex SMETA)
  • On-site visits by our own auditors
  • Mandatory certification (e.g. Oeko-Tex Step, GOTS, GRS)
  • Establishment of a grievance management system
  • Deployment of sustainability coordinators at our own production plants in Egypt & Turkey; with further Tier 1 suppliers, complementary measures are carried out (e.g. audits, questionnaires, individual consultations)

2.1 Prioritised Risks at a Glance

Our risk analysis (as of July 2025) prioritises human-rights-related and environment-related risks on two levels:

(a) Sector-specific in accordance with the OECD guidelines for the textile sector:

Type of riskWeighting
Discrimination, sexual harassment, gender inequalitymedium
Working hours and overtimemedium
Occupational safety (e.g. machinery, ergonomics)medium
Greenhouse gas emissions and climate impactlow

(b) Country-specific in relation to our sites:

Based on our own assessment and external sources (including amfori, ITUC), the following country risks were classified as having heightened relevance:

  • Turkey: wage stability, rights of women and minorities
  • Egypt: inflation, living wages, freedom of expression
  • India, Pakistan: social exclusion, discrimination, labour rights

These prioritised risks form the strategic starting point for further measure planning. Specific assignments of measures to these risks take place within the framework of annual planning and in alignment with the functions of sustainability coordination, grievance evaluation and audit reports. In doing so, we are guided by the actual need for action at each site, whereby the relationship between probability of occurrence and severity of harm determines the priority. The risk assessment is updated annually and is firmly embedded in our sustainability management. Feedback from direct suppliers is captured in a structured manner via questionnaires and personal conversations and incorporated into the risk analysis. Care is taken to ensure that responses are documented in such a way that they can be evaluated in the analysis and compared with internal assessments.

3. Dealing with Stakeholders & Vulnerable Groups

We regularly identify particularly vulnerable groups along our supply chain. Currently documented:

CountryVulnerable group
EgyptLGBTIQ+, women, children, people with disabilities
TurkeyLGBTIQ+, women, children, people with disabilities
PakistanLGBTIQ+, women, children, people with disabilities
IndiaLGBTIQ+, women, children, people with disabilities
GermanyLGBTIQ+, women

Special protection mechanisms exist for these groups, e.g.:

  • On-site contact persons
  • human rights policy & anti-discrimination guidelines
  • confidential & multilingual communication
  • Awareness-raising among managers

4. Grievance Mechanism & Results

Our multi-stage grievance system comprises:

  • Suggestion & grievance boxes on site
  • Anonymised online forms (DE/EN/TR/AR)
  • Persons of trust & coordinators as points of contact
  • Regular documentation & evaluation

Key topics of grievances 2022–2025 (Egypt site):

All grievances were classified as factually justified, without direct causation by Weberei Pahl. All concerns were documented, processed and measures were initiated (e.g. installation of fan heaters, lighting, childcare solutions).

Topic areaNumber
Health & hygieneHigh
Water & heatHigh
LightingMedium
CleanlinessMedium
ChildcareLow
Noise & indoor climateLow
Leave & structureLow

Effectiveness is assessed on the basis of the following criteria:

  • Share of Tier 1 suppliers with preventive occupational health and safety measures
  • Frequency and recurrence of topics
  • Implementation rate of measures
  • Processing time & feedback

Progress & effectiveness: In recent years, we have been able to observe that grievances are increasingly being processed more quickly and that measures are being implemented promptly. Recurring concerns have declined, which indicates a sustainable effect of the steps taken. Preventive measures, such as occupational safety training and improved safety standards, have contributed to stabilising the number of grievances in the area of occupational safety. These observations confirm that both preventive and remedial measures achieve tangible progress.

5. Promotion of Living Wages

1. Summary

Securing and promoting living wages remains a central objective of Weberei Pahl. On the basis of the current risk analysis (2025), the topic was confirmed as a prioritised human-rights risk in both production countries – Turkey and Egypt. The analysis shows that wage stability and purchasing power depend significantly on inflation, exchange rates and regional living costs. Thanks to our close, family-organised structure, necessary adjustments can be implemented quickly and negative consequences for employees can be effectively mitigated.

2. Measures, Progress, Effectiveness, KPIs

Results of the risk analysis (2025)

The risk analysis shows:

  • Turkey: inflation-driven fluctuations and differences between industry wages and regional living costs; ongoing monitoring of purchasing power required.
  • Egypt: rising living costs and more volatile price developments increase the risk of a wage-cost gap.
  • Cross-cutting: informal employment relationships at upstream stages can complicate wage transparency and equal treatment.

The analyses were compared with benchmarks from international sources (e.g. GLWC, Asia Floor Wage and local minimum wage data). These serve for classification, not for direct wage determination.

Measures and progress

  • Regular assessment of wage and living-cost developments at both plants by local coordinators.
  • Coordination of price adjustments along the procurement chain to ensure wage stability.
  • Documentation of wage developments at our own plants as part of the annual risk analysis.
  • Awareness-raising among suppliers (Tier 1) via questionnaires and individual conversations on living wages and working conditions.
  • Integration of the topic into supplier assessment and future procurement criteria.

Effectiveness and progress measurement (qualitative)

Effectiveness is regularly assessed on the basis of the following qualitative indicators:

  • Stability of wage developments despite regional price fluctuations,
  • Feedback from grievance channels and audits with no indications of wage delays,
  • Positive feedback from plant exchanges and workforce discussions,
  • Increasing involvement of suppliers in the topic of living wages.

Overall, the results show that the approach taken so far – combining informal and formal steering instruments – supports an effective stabilisation of incomes at our sites.

3. Assessment (cost-effectiveness, risk, feasibility)

Assessment dimensionEvaluationRationale
Cost-effectivenessmediumPrice and wage adjustments require coordination but are an integral part of stable supply chains.
Risk mitigationhighDirect family-level coordination enables rapid response to crises (e.g. inflation, exchange rate).
FeasibilityhighShort communication channels, local coordinators and existing management structures facilitate implementation.

4. Recommendations and next steps (2026 onwards)

  • Formalisation of the documentation of wage assessments (annual comparative report per plant).
  • Further expansion of supplier communication on living wages.
  • Examination of industry initiatives for joint data collection and exchange

6. Responsibilities

  • Strategic responsibility: management of Weberei Pahl
  • Operational implementation: management in Egypt and Turkey
  • Monitoring & documentation: sustainability coordinators with reporting obligations to the management in Egypt, Turkey and Weberei Pahl
  • Communication: sustainability management of Weberei Pahl (external & website reporting)

7. Supply Chain Transparency & Origin

As a vertically integrated company with its own production plants in Egypt and Turkey, we are able to fully capture and regularly assess our direct business partners (Tier 1). Our plants are 100% company-owned, which gives us full transparency over processes, working conditions and materials used at these stages.

For upstream stages (Tier 2 and Tier 3), we are increasingly capturing places of origin, material sources and the partners involved. In doing so, we are guided by the requirements of Grüner Knopf 2.0.1 and are progressively extending the depth of the data:

  • Tier 1: Own plants in Turkey and Egypt, regularly audited and monitored.
  • Tier 2: Yarn suppliers with Oeko-Tex, GOTS or GRS certification; origin data is documented.
  • Tier 3: Initial origin information on cotton and recycled materials is available; systematic recording is in preparation.

Our goal is to be able to trace all main materials back to countries of origin and sustainable practices in the medium term. An elevated monitoring standard applies to sensitive supplier relationships. The sustainability coordinators actively accompany this process for our own production sites and capture risk-based data points on origin. With further Tier 1 suppliers, origin data is increasingly secured through audits, certificates and individual supplier conversations.

8. Comprehensibility & Accessibility of Reporting

Our sustainability information is publicly accessible via our website:

  • Central address: www.weberei-pahl.de/verantwortung
  • Available content: policy statement, code of conduct, sustainability reporting, certificates, audit evidence, grievance procedure
  • Languages: German (complete), English (code of conduct, sustainability reporting)
  • Publication cycle: continuously updated, reviewed at least once a year (see version history in documents)

The content has been designed so that it is comprehensible for different target groups (customers, business partners, auditors, the public). The structure is based on core elements of the Grüner Knopf and follows the principle "Do good and talk about it".

In both the text and the tone, attention was paid to clear language and transparency. Content is not promotional but descriptive and documented in a comprehensible manner. The key documents are clearly named, downloadable and provided with a revision status.

9. KPI-Based Progress Measurement

To assess the progress of our due diligence processes, we use quantitative and qualitative indicators. These enable us to track developments, make successes measurable and identify areas for improvement. The basis is, among other things, the prioritised topics defined in the risk analysis as well as the operational feedback from audits, grievances and coordinator reports.

Examples of key figures used:

  • Share of audited suppliers with social or environmental certifications
  • Feedback from the grievance mechanism (number, processing rate)
  • Progress in documenting wage developments
  • Share of implemented measures from risk management

The KPIs are reviewed annually and documented internally. For better traceability, the assessment follows a traffic-light system:

  • green = fulfilled
  • yellow = in implementation / partially fulfilled
  • red = not yet fulfilled, measures initiated

In individual areas – such as the traceability of wages at Tier 2 level – there is still a need for development. Initial measures have been started here, which are continuously accompanied by our sustainability coordination.

This system allows continuous progress monitoring in the sense of the PDCA cycle (Plan – Do – Check – Act).

10. Comparison with Previous Years & Target System

Each year, we compare the development of central sustainability topics on the basis of our risk analysis, KPIs and documented measures. The aim is to make progress transparent and to identify areas for improvement at an early stage.

Observed developments (examples):

  • Grievances: stable use of the system, key topics constant (e.g. health, indoor climate)
  • Risks: prioritised risks such as discrimination and occupational safety remain unchanged in their relevance
  • Implementation of measures: a high share of short-term measures from 2024 already implemented
  • Wage development: improvements documented at Tier 1 level; Tier 2 progress in preparation

Target systems are derived from:

  • the internal risk and measure plans
  • external standards such as GOTS, Oeko-Tex Step or SMETA
  • strategic targets set by the management

Target achievement is assessed on the basis of the internal traffic-light system and reflected at regular intervals with the sustainability coordinators at our own plants. For further Tier 1 suppliers, progress assessment takes place via project-related feedback, audit results and measure feedback. Particularly in areas with a structural need for development (e.g. origin transparency Tier 2+), measures are pursued according to the principle of "continuous progress".

This systematic progress and target assessment is an integral part of our annual sustainability review.